From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proposed `list-dynamic-libraries' Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 12:37:13 -0300 Message-ID: References: <874o549atb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83ei48jsdi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304955444 5709 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 15:37:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 17:37:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWN-0001ww-TZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:37:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWN-0000cQ-E2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWL-0000cF-Im for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWK-0000kF-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:56651) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWK-0000kB-NR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:44512 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJSWJ-0001CA-QU; Mon, 09 May 2011 11:37:16 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D24A366152; Mon, 9 May 2011 12:37:13 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 9 May 2011 16:34:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139265 Archived-At: >> How 'bout lisp/misc.el? > ;;; misc.el --- some nonstandard basic editing commands for Emacs > and all misc.el commands (except for the XKCD-inspired `butterfly') > are related to editing, which list-dynamic-libraries most definitely > is not. > But if you think it's a good place, there it goes. I don't think it matters much. I'm just not expecting this list-libraries to grow much in the future nor to be of regular use (it's more like a debugging tool you might use occasionally). The former tells me that it might not deserve its own file, the latter tells me that it doesn't matter if loading it causes unrelated code to be loaded as well. Stefan