From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9979: 24.0.91; doc string of `save-window-excursion' Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:49:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320673824 8974 80.91.229.12 (7 Nov 2011 13:50:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9979@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 07 14:50:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPaZ-00030p-V7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPaZ-00079V-2h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPaW-00079Q-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPaV-0006ed-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPaV-0006eX-9D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPdG-0006NQ-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9979 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9979-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9979.132067393224455 (code B ref 9979); Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9979) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2011 13:52:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPcR-0006MN-OK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNPcP-0006ME-IZ for 9979@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:52:10 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAIbgt05MCoYy/2dsb2JhbABDqWWBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBW2G4krBIgLmViESA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,470,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="146686889" Original-Received: from 76-10-134-50.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.134.50]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Nov 2011 08:49:16 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 846CB59212; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:49:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 6 Nov 2011 14:59:31 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:53:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53659 Archived-At: > Are you really > suggesting that most of the existing uses of this macro introduce bugs? Yes. > But that too does not really say what you want (IIUC). No one would use > this to try to _prevent_ opening a new window. This No one seems to write an awful lot of Elisp code, sadly. Stefan