From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383174710 27069 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 23:11:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 31 00:11:52 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbevY-0005xi-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:11:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54778 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbevX-0005pa-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbevO-0005pU-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbevG-0008S1-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:51429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbevG-0008Rt-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:34 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="36720469" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([108.161.119.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Oct 2013 19:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CEB9FAE1C4; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:11:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:46:25 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164718 Archived-At: > Debug on signal t doesn't catch this which is why it's proving a > bear to debug. But you can call `backtrace' from a `signal' advice to see the context. It's probably code in the menu-bar entries trying to decide if an entry should be active or not. Stefan