From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Org merge Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8738n5cijg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384090251 30473 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2013 13:30:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:30:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 10 14:30:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VfV6N-0004IN-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:30:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60330 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfV6M-0007zT-IJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfV6D-0007zO-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfV66-0008Kh-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:2724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VfV5y-0008GH-Jk; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:30 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+LrM/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+LrM/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="37502319" Original-Received: from 206-248-186-204.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.186.204]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Nov 2013 08:30:27 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DBA2960630; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:30:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8738n5cijg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 09 Nov 2013 23:33:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165114 Archived-At: > One question: if e.g. org-latex.el has been fully rewritten and > renamed ox-latex.el, shall we ignore changes that happen after the > rewrite and only say something like > * org-latex.el: Delete. > * ox-latex.el: Renamed and rewritten from org-latex.el If the two are completely different, then yes,or: * org-latex.el: Delete. * ox-latex.el: New file, to replace it. -- Stefan