From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17823: 24.3.91; end-of-visual-line: incorrect behaviour with truncate-lines and a line-prefix Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r42jv5rr.fsf@yahoo.fr> <83ionvqujt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403292150 10563 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2014 19:22:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:22:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Richard , 17823@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 20 21:22:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4OE-0003Ut-8j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:22:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4OD-0003Ey-Ir for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4O3-0003Dp-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:22:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4Nu-0006Eb-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4Nu-0006EX-I3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4Nu-00067t-4V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17823 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17823-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17823.140329206523472 (code B ref 17823); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 19:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2014 19:21:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55121 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4Mu-00065y-In for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:14828) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wy4Mn-00065k-Tt for 17823@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([24.203.184.39]) by VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-22.01 64bit (built Apr 21 2011)) with ESMTP id <0N7H00KS4F2T8640@VL-VM-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for 17823@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:20:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E6263660FA; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:20:54 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <83ionvqujt.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90614 Archived-At: > Why do you expect that? "Visual line" means the line that is on > display. What isn't on display does not exist for this purpose. Hmm... good point. My intuitive understanding of the "visual line" feature is to distinguish the "newlines" from the "line wraps", so when we `truncate-lines' I'd expect the visual-line movements to be the same as the physical line movements (tho I'd allow a distinction in the case of line-wraps introduced via `display' of before/after-strings). Stefan