From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18381: 24.3.93; Diary can wrongly be displayed in Calendar's window Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:00:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k35nqtdd.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <54085AC5.5050304@gmx.at> <7lr3zrjm94.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <64a96fko3d.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <54099491.4040607@gmx.at> <540ACB49.8010405@gmx.at> <9l38c2bqbo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87bnqpj1k3.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <540EA527.4050809@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410267688 10986 80.91.229.3 (9 Sep 2014 13:01:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 13:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Berman , 18381@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 09 15:01:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2v-00019O-0M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:01:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2u-0005di-MC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2k-0005cT-CL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2c-0006li-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2c-0006lc-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL2c-0001Jd-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18381 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18381-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18381.14102676284986 (code B ref 18381); Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18381) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2014 13:00:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL23-0001IJ-2M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:00:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:40604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XRL1z-0001IA-W1 for 18381@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:00:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s89D0LAT001313; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:00:22 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A8EE960787; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 09:00:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 09 Sep 2014 03:44:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5059=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5059> : inlines <1267> : streams <1285426> : uri <1812031> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93178 Archived-At: >>> (let ((display-buffer-fallback-action >>> (list (delq 'display-buffer-in-previous-window >>> (copy-sequence (car display-buffer-fallback-action)))))) >>> ...) > [...] >> (let ((display-buffer-overriding-action >> (list (delq 'display-buffer-in-previous-window >> (copy-sequence (car display-buffer-fallback-action)))))) >> ...) > I can't see that the second form is substantially cleaner than the > first, but ok. Indeed, they both have downsides. I think as a "stop-gap" fix, I think the first is preferable. Stefan