From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) [Documentation fix still remaining] Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83tweugeu9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160809163814.GD4893@acm.fritz.box> <83inv9hkjd.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9ashfgx.fsf@gnu.org> <831t1wharr.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvkaduh0.fsf@gnu.org> <20160819084526.GA1971@acm.fritz.box> <834m6hdsvs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471598567 21800 195.159.176.226 (19 Aug 2016 09:22:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:22:47 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 19 11:22:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bag0f-0005FI-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:22:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56376 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bag0d-0003PZ-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:22:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bag0W-0003PU-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bag0R-0002Bz-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:58832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bag0R-0002Bv-M6; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u7J9L40s001961; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 34F03AE0E7; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 05:21:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <834m6hdsvs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:12:39 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5770=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5770> : inlines <5119> : streams <1686557> : uri <2269917> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206664 Archived-At: >> Somebody wanting to use b-c-f and reading that text is likely to conclude >> that b-c-f is called for _every_ change, just as I did ~10 years ago. > Then they will be wrong, because the text doesn't say so. I think we're talking about different notions of "every change". More specifically, I think I don't understand what Alan thinks "every change" means, and I suspect that he doesn't understand what I mean by that either. Stefan