From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lldb support Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:24:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20161107150552.20e98985@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20161107220815.606cd583@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <6c239d49-a92c-1495-7121-4808295a4fc2@dancol.org> <735f8965-609a-d0c2-82bc-19a2393186b6@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478838397 15941 195.159.176.226 (11 Nov 2016 04:26:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 04:26:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 11 05:26:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Ph-00007O-Gc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:26:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50667 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Pk-0005i1-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Ow-0005h4-CN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:25:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Ot-0004Co-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58690 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Os-0004CA-W4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:25:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c53Of-0000WE-Cm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 05:25:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:6t7ueUz/SoNYdJglhr9m7lcUadw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209336 Archived-At: > Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part > of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages, > and its success is the GNU Project's loss. I believe this is false. LLDB is not a part of that. It's probably true of a part of LLVM/LLDB/Clang, but let's not get carried away. Stefan