From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lifting all buffer restrictions in indentation functions Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 12:50:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83wp1xupqs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512755495 27698 195.159.176.226 (8 Dec 2017 17:51:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:51:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 08 18:51:32 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMo8-000778-3V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:51:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38424 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMoF-0000FB-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 12:51:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMni-0000Ev-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 12:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMnf-0002cn-44 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 12:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=36520 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMne-0002cX-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 12:51:03 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNMnU-0005vx-Nb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 18:50:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:9JO1zZjdXFmRbJEiO2rUqu8w8U0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220797 Archived-At: > ​You don't say in your message but I would assume that > a save-restriction is used automatically within these > tab commands so that after the indent command, the > restriction is restored and there is no need for callers > to wrap indent functions within a save-restriction. Yes, of course. Stefan