From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to control where frames get created? Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:20:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180929183701.0b49b97d@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <5BB081FC.8030704@gmx.at> <20180930101435.7b834510@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20180930104147.4fd8c509@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1538324415 29264 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2018 16:20:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:20:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 18:20:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eS2-0007Su-Cw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:20:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eU9-0008Ut-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eTI-0008Nl-Eb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:21:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eT8-0000Z2-W3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:21:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=37199 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eT0-0000Gf-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 12:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6eQp-0005wM-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:18:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:iANbBzeQKTLQd/r6P+Ja9+1S8Bw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230172 Archived-At: > Actually, it is _almost_ perfect. For some odd reason, the new window > ends up a few pixels lower than the old. I can fix this with some > subtraction but I'm puzzled why setting top to (cdr (frame-position)) > isn't quite doing the right thing. Probably the difference between the position of the inner and the outer (decoration) window. Stefan