From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OK to put lisp/progmodes/flymake.el in ELPA as a :core package? Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:03:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k1knwlpu.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1544101311 10894 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2018 13:01:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:01:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 06 14:01:47 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gUtHl-0002cm-6t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 14:01:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40930 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUtJr-0007AM-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUtJ7-0006hr-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:03:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUtJ2-0002SP-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gUtJ2-0002NV-I6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 08:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id wB6D32ls008088; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 66C076AA40; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 08:03:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2018 06:43:01 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6434=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6434> : inlines <6979> : streams <1806340> : uri <2761013> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231682 Archived-At: > Should it be a separate function? Package-install-most-recent or package > upgrade? Maybe a new `package-get-latest`, so you can do (package-install (package-get-latest)) Especially if package-get-latest can be extracted from existing code (and hence used there was well). Stefan