From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:45:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <87wsv4fvav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <46DFC3AE.3020009@gmx.at> <46E0136F.6080602@gmx.at> <46E06C5B.80408@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189187210 14813 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 17:46:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Glenn Morris , Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 19:46:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IThun-0006X2-1H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IThul-0001Ur-Eb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IThui-0001UX-5h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IThug-0001UB-E2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IThug-0001U6-9o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IThuY-00030X-BQ; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from x-132-204-253-127.xtpr.umontreal.ca ([132.204.253.127] helo=ceviche.home) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IThuX-0007RJ-DW; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:46:29 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D009AB40A1; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:45:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <46E06C5B.80408@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu\, 06 Sep 2007 23\:08\:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78174 Archived-At: >> I understand. But I'd just want a clearer explanation about why that would >> be a better choice in general (or even in his particular case). > He wants a window of the same size display the same buffer in the same > area of the same frame, whatever he's doing. I must have lost too much context: I do not understand the above description. Can someone spell it out in baby-steps for my poor excuse for a brain? Stefan