From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Crash in face_at_buffer_position Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <480362A7.4010403@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208184526 17046 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 14:48:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 16:48:57 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlPnb-0004V5-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:36:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlPmx-0000qF-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlPms-0000pX-F8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlPmr-0000pF-PT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlPmr-0000pC-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlPmr-0004p3-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JlPmr-0003V4-2r for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlPmn-0004nl-E1 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182] helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlPmn-0004nd-6R for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:57 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAOoIA0hMCqsI/2dsb2JhbACBXqg3 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,655,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="18475631" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2008 10:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.171.8]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id USX31656; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 057EB8A41; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:35:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <480362A7.4010403@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:56:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95182 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22022 Archived-At: > I am not sure if this bug report is of any value. I believe it might have > something to do with that I have made some bad changes to > syntax-ppss. Anyway, I did not expect Emacs to crash. Here is what I get > from the debugger: You mean you've made some changes to syntax-ppss but no changes to the C code? Then it indeed shouldn't be the cause of the bug (tho it might have triggered it, of course). > The backtrace seems to be very, very long. Most likely the SIGSEGV is nothing more than stack-overflow because of "infinite" recursion and the bug is probably not in face_at_buffer_position. Stefan