From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bugtracker sets bad Mail-Followup-To Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bph5q9yb.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262983149 358 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2010 20:39:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sven Joachim , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 08 21:39:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NTLbm-0004gM-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:38:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NTLbm-0002sr-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NTLbh-0002sQ-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NTLbc-0002od-Kg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52951 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NTLbc-0002oY-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:22088) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTLba-0000Wc-NY; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTLbZ-0005zF-Vv; Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:38:46 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o08KcfRo006019; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:38:41 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5DF7390018; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:38:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 08 Jan 2010 12:26:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3444=0 X-detected-operating-system: by mx20.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119731 Archived-At: > It's an attempt to reduce the massive mail duplication that existed > before, when people kept replying to nnn@ and bug-gnu-emacs. > Is the right thing to do: > 1) When I reply to nnn@, the mail that debbugs sends out should have > neither MFT nor RT in the headers. Then people can just followup as > normal. > 2) When I send a new mail to bug-gnu-emacs or submit@, the new report > that goes out should either: > a) Have MFT set to nnn@, and no RT header (same as at present, bug > remove RT). > b) Have To: set to nnn@ rather than bug-gnu-emacs. (I think this is > preferable?) > If so, I will _try_ to implement it. IMO, the "right" thing to do is to replace bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org and emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org by nnn@debbugs.gnu.org everywhere in the headers. Stefan