From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <833a073kss.fsf@gnu.org> <83wrxj1o92.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdd220yk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268334526 15453 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2010 19:08:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:08:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 11 20:08:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpnkO-0000Y6-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:08:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56970 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Npngw-0000me-2U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Npngq-0000jq-Ns for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49476 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Npngp-0000hb-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Npngo-00075G-VB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:53571 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Npngm-00074s-5x; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:56 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEADTNmEtLd+qv/2dsb2JhbACaYHS9OIR7BIMXh3U X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,622,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="58021646" Original-Received: from 75-119-234-175.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.234.175]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2010 14:04:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CC67E81C2; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83vdd220yk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:00:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121826 Archived-At: >> >> > By contrast, the local branch where I develop bidi Emacs is based on >> >> > Emacs 23.1 and is merged with mainline once a week. >> >> What are you waiting for to publish it at >> >> sftp://bzr.sv.gnu.org/srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-bidi? >> > Why does it make sense not to merge to the trunk directly? >> ;-) > That was an honest question. Yidong said it was okay to merge with > the trunk, but if you disagree, I won't. My question was meant as "why keep it for yourself rather than publish it in the emacs-bidi branch?". Of course, installing it on the trunk would be even better. > (Not that you should expect the merge today or tomorrow, even if > everybody agrees.) Right, so unless this is expected to be "real soon now", you might want to publish your branch in `emacs-bidi'. You could even use that to ask people to test it (in non-bidi mode) before merging it into trunk. Stefan