From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What have the Romans done for us? (Bazaar) Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100405145637.GA3248@muc.de> <87mxxhhq3b.fsf@red-bean.com> <83vdc5yhsd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270496732 5925 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2010 19:45:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 21:45:30 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysEj-00077S-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:45:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NysEi-0002Vl-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:45:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NysEC-0002J5-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=32838 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NysEA-0002IU-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysE9-0003ie-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:53079 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NysE7-0003hy-UV; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:44:51 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANfauUvO+K6K/2dsb2JhbACbS3K3JoUHBIsq X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,366,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60247467" Original-Received: from 206-248-174-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.174.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2010 15:44:51 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D1E13660BF; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:44:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83vdc5yhsd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:40:18 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123220 Archived-At: >> Yes. But remember: https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107077 >> (which is actively being worked on). > Thanks. Any ETA? It's really annoying to wait 2-3 minutes each time > I do a simple "bzr up", and similarly for "bzr ci" to the public > repository. FWIW, it will be an improvement, but don't expect it to become zippy either. > Well, yes, but the quality of the Bazaar docs leaves a lot to be > desired. E.g., I just learned (through a question posted to the > Bazaar list) that to fully revert a tree to a certain old revision, > one needs to do a "bzr update -rNNN" rather than "bzr revert -rNNN". Of course, this actually depends on what you define as "fully revert a tree to a certain old revision". If the intention is to undo the changes since that revision, then "bzr revert -rNNN" is the right answer, IIUC. Whereas if you want to revert to revision NNN to reproduce a bug there, then "bzr update -rNNN" is probably what you want. "bzr revert" is kind of like "cvs update -p", whereas "bzr update" is kind of like "cvs update". Stefan