From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:17:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83d3qt77lj.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCA9E5D.5060002@swipnet.se> <838w1h6zbp.fsf@gnu.org> <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> <2EDD5E782A7C473C875477D2F2A4B743@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288719822 22813 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2010 17:43:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 18:43:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKtV-00060v-48 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 18:43:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58427 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDKtU-0005Bo-6O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34362 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDKtL-0005Am-OK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKtK-0003ek-Rm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKtK-0003eg-P1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKQr-0000pu-L5; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:14:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7296.12887180053206 (code B ref 7296); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2010 17:13:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKQH-0000pf-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKQG-0000pa-2I for 7296@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA2HHgge014241; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5751CB40E9; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 13:17:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 2 Nov 2010 16:24:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3667=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:14:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41373 Archived-At: > Yes, you are right it is not enough. On w32 you get the values for the > workarea as a rectangle with the functions I pointed to. Maybe we > should have a function that return a list with the work area values > (top left right bottom) instead? That would be more useful, yes. Not sure if it would be useful at all, in general, tho: e.g. I don't know if such data can be obtained for X11 and/or *Step. If not, then maybe this data should be kept internal and only the fullheight and fullwidth thingies should make use of it (under w32). Stefan