From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elpa.gnu.org repository sync with Emacs Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:48:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mxpabjj3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762vyz5rl.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8739r2z1w8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87y68t8jif.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87r5eljosw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fwv1rukn.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyjh3xgo.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87mxp71xd0.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8662vsqph5.fsf@betla.home> <87vd3pe7og.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290444572 908 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2010 16:49:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 22 17:49:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKZa2-0006rS-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 17:49:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60080 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKZa1-00035a-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:49:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52186 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKZZT-0002jV-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:49:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKZYr-0001qf-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:48:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:51417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKZYr-0001qZ-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:48:13 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAMGmAdD023325; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:48:11 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1B629A83C8; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:48:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87vd3pe7og.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:47:59 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3686=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133016 Archived-At: > I think we have a majority in favor of ELLE (Lars, RMS, and me). Can we > rely on Chong Yidong and Stefan Monnier to make the final decision? I stand by my suggestion to name the machine emacs.gnu.org (in short, EGO) and use the name "packages" for the Bzr branch (and URLs to emacs.gnu.org would also use "packages" somewhere) that holds the unbundled packages. Stefan