From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8141: 23.2.94; python-fill-paragraph Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:18:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4D6C0BF0.3050001@easy-emacs.de> <86fwr7a6m3.fsf@gmail.com> <4D6CCE64.8060203@easy-emacs.de> <4D762069.7080604@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299620253 8564 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2011 21:37:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , 8141@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 22:37:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4au-0005rI-3X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 22:37:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37379 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px4at-0000pf-G4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:37:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38932 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Px4aR-0000eR-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4aQ-0007ve-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4aQ-0007va-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4J3-0006Hl-UW; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8141 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8141-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8141.129961909724108 (code B ref 8141); Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8141) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2011 21:18:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4IK-0006Gn-SU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Px4IJ-0006Gb-Iy for 8141@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p28LI9tW015317; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DF6D61300D7; Tue, 8 Mar 2011 16:18:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D762069.7080604@easy-emacs.de> ("Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?="'s message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:26:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3735=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:19:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44802 Archived-At: >> No, the current definition is on purpose. > IMHO that introduces complexity, even if there are reasons for. > If modes introduce their own fill-function, it's better to leave them > than. If the modes need some later stuff from fill.el, they may take it. What complexity? If the mode's fill function wants to do it all itself, than it just needs to return a non-nil value. Stefan