From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dired.c Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 16:53:26 -0300 Message-ID: References: <5B0C3CF2-85D0-4D68-BFA1-B30B19F8A36C@gmail.com> <4DB50FF2.6060906@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304538824 8511 80.91.229.12 (4 May 2011 19:53:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 19:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Crotti Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 21:53:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8g-0008W7-7k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 21:53:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37500 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8f-0002I2-IC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:53:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8Z-0002Hb-Uf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8Z-0003ax-4J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8Z-0003ar-1U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:20746 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHi8Y-0007bV-7P; Wed, 04 May 2011 15:53:30 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 06B4866168; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:53:27 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Crotti's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:58:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139116 Archived-At: >> Actually, IIUC we could move it all to eval.c. > I just tried out what you suggested and it compiles to me with these changes: > (sorry it's not a right bzr patch format I still have to check how to do it) I don't believe it compiles with your change. You must have done a "recompile" which ended up deciding that nothing significant needed to be done. Stefan