From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: adding a standard font-lock-number-face Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308317997 27260 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 13:39:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Fabian Ezequiel Gallina Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 15:39:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZH6-0003RH-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:39:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZH4-0001gb-IU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:39:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZFe-0001Q9-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZFd-0001e4-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:42030 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXZFc-0001du-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:21 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAB9Y+01FpZvP/2dsb2JhbABSpm14iHO/CIYnBJ1YhB8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,381,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="116519506" Original-Received: from 69-165-155-207.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.155.207]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Jun 2011 09:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 77CEF59010; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:38:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Fabian Ezequiel Gallina's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:54:55 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140598 Archived-At: > An argument I can think of for inclusion is that it seems highlighting > those kind of stuff (event operators) is really common on other > editors, so it is acceptable that people coming from other places > would expect this kind of stuff highlighted out-of-the-box. I know the I haven't seen many complaints about it either in emacs-devel or gnu-emacs-help, so I don't think it makes much difference. People do not expect one editor to behave exactly like another. Stefan