From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Usage examples of dedicated windows and popup frames? Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871uy0n9ch.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310141527 25204 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2011 16:12:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 18:12:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDet-0001eU-BO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:12:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43047 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDes-0005U2-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDeU-0005Sp-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDeS-0004Ai-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:31318 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfDeS-0004Ab-0g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:11:36 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EADsrF05MCqt8/2dsb2JhbABSp0d4yyCGOASefYQv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,500,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="123817189" Original-Received: from 76-10-171-124.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.171.124]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Jul 2011 12:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 229B959160; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 12:11:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871uy0n9ch.fsf@member.fsf.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:19:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141802 Archived-At: > (setq pop-up-frames 'graphic-only > display-buffer-reuse-frames t) > in *scratch* to try out something completely different from the default > behavior. And basically I it's not that bad. But after using it for an > hour, I have more than 10 open emacs frames now. Most of them were > opened for showing completion possibilities, but after I've finished > completion they became useless. It would be great if those would be > closed automagically... "They" should be iconified automatically and only one frame should be (re-)used for *Completions*. Stefan