From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs Emacs package names Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:11:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310911979 32593 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2011 14:12:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:12:59 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 17 16:12:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QiS5T-00087E-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 16:12:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiS5R-0004BM-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:12:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiS4Y-00041q-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiS4X-0002Ei-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:17238 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QiS4X-0002Ee-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:11:53 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMGANnsIk5MCqt8/2dsb2JhbABSmG+PAHiIfMEWhjwEnyeEMA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,218,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="126283653" Original-Received: from 76-10-171-124.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.171.124]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Jul 2011 10:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A44EF660D8; Sun, 17 Jul 2011 10:11:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:18:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142069 Archived-At: > I wonder whether there's much point in tagging stuff as "emacs,gnus" or > "emacs,org-mode". Presumably the Gnus and Org maintainers will deal > with these bugs, so would it make sense to just assign them solely to > "gnus" and "org-mode"? I guess that's right for Gnus, but I don't know if Org maintainers consult debbugs on a regular basis. Stefan