From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326225475 30905 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 19:57:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 20:57:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkhpP-0000Un-Km for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:57:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkhpP-0002r7-AZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57514) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkhpH-0002qH-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkhpG-0005sY-Cc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:43 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkhpG-0005sU-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkhpa-0004wH-6x; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.132622543918932 (code B ref 9243); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2012 19:57:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52822 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkhos-0004vJ-EL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60859) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkhoq-0004vC-A6 for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0AJusFS026112; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:54 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1171EB40FA; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 07 Jan 2012 04:25:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4097=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4097> : streams <718541> : uri <1044351> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55616 Archived-At: After (setq nnimap-expunge nil), the expiry that happens when I leave a group still takes a good while (I didn't notice any serious difference), but moving email from one IMAP folder to another with "B m" is *much* faster. Stefan