From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11295: 24.0.95; New ibuffer filter derived-mode Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:44:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5DACA6C4-9C85-4464-B488-5FEEB6919839@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335037540 31313 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2012 19:45:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:45:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11295@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ivan Andrus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 21 21:45:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFU-0000uK-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:45:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFT-0003vn-Lx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42801) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFQ-0003uz-Jy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFO-0001fk-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFO-0001ff-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFt-0000aT-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11295 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11295-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11295.13350375202203 (code B ref 11295); Sat, 21 Apr 2012 19:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11295) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Apr 2012 19:45:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46061 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFE-0000ZU-5e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:27331) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLgFC-0000ZI-Sy for 11295@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEKACxOgk/O+K5t/2dsb2JhbABDtheCDAOBDIEIggkBAQQBViMQCw4mEhQYDSSIHAW2MothhHkEpEWBXYMD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="175821428" Original-Received: from 206-248-174-109.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.174.109]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Apr 2012 15:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0FBE658D2D; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:44:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ivan Andrus's message of "Sat, 21 Apr 2012 17:24:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59374 Archived-At: >> Why not use (with-current-buffer buf (derived-mode-p parent))? > Uh. That would have been too easy. :-) I can relate to that. >> Another question: couldn't it simply *replace* the existing mode filter? >> I guess it could be a bit annoying if you want to see fundamental-mode >> buffers (since most modes derive from it), but that's the only downside >> I can think of. > I thought about it, but I do in fact filter by fundamental-mode (and a few > other modes) to hide "useless" buffers. Fair enough. Please send us an updated patch, so we can install it, Stefan