From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13200: 24.1.50; Ruby Mode Indentation after Here Docs Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87hanmmf5u.fsf@saturn.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87a9t6kyho.wl%ded-law@ddoherty.net> <20693.65320.439193.221152@gnu.org> <87r4mgzuys.fsf@yandex.ru> <50D72C0A.2070508@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356310182 30518 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2012 00:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ded-law@ddoherty.net, 13200@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 24 01:49:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEs-0004l5-3V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 01:49:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEe-0001u7-3R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEa-0001u0-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEZ-00057D-0Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:36 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEY-000579-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEz-0006np-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13200 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13200-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13200.135631019126125 (code B ref 13200); Mon, 24 Dec 2012 00:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13200) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2012 00:49:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57177 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEo-0006nJ-W4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:40081) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TmwEn-0006nD-CR for 13200@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:49 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLDj/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgcBQu5egSQRAOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="210616769" Original-Received: from 69-196-176-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.176.227]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Dec 2012 19:49:21 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8B6DA59067; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:49:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50D72C0A.2070508@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:06:34 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68966 Archived-At: >>>> package.el should be able to ignore your "out of date" elpa version if >>>> the bundled version is more recent, so it should work even if you don't >>>> uninstall the elpa version. >>> By ignore, do you mean it won't show up in the list of packages >>> available to install? >> No, I mean it should not be added to load-path during startup. > That may add to the confusion in this case. "I installed ruby-mode 1.1, but > it didn't do anything!", or something. No, because package.el wouldn't let you install 1.1 when you have 1.2 bundled (at least, not without warning you). So this would only cause the downloaded package to be suddenly superseded by the bundled package when you upgrade Emacs, which is The Right Thing To Do. >>> Do you think we should bump it to 1.2? >> Depends. Is it a fork? > I meant, bump the version of the bundled ruby-mode. I understand this. But the question still stands: is the bundled version really a more up-to-date version, or do we have a fork and there are good reasons why someone would want to use the ELPA version over the built-in one? > The "ruby-mode 1.1" doesn't contain any substantial changes, AFAICT, so > there's nothing to merge. But it is present in both Marmalade and the > original ELPA. Sounds like it's not a fork. So we should bump our version accordingly. > I opened an issue at the repo of the Marmalade uploader > (https://github.com/resure/ruby-mode/issues/1), and if that doesn't result > in anything, I'll escalate to the current Marmalade maintainer. I'm not sure that there's a problem on their side. They also cater to older Emacsen. Stefan