From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eshell and Sudo Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:48:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ehgg451n.fsf@gnu.org> <87txpc3wnn.fsf@gmx.de> <87wqu6u91q.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wulqvd.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87fw0uu4c6.fsf@gmx.de> <8738wur054.fsf@dimension8.tehua.net> <87ppzyxl94.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361195349 17508 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2013 13:49:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Aidan Gauland , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 14:49:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U7R60-0003z8-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:49:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7R5f-0006YU-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7R5X-0006Y0-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7R5P-0004Au-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:35494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U7R5P-0004Aa-8p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:48:51 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxKjI/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxKjI/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="1658927" Original-Received: from 69-196-168-200.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.168.200]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 18 Feb 2013 08:48:49 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8C0036C2AF; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:48:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ppzyxl94.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:07:51 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157124 Archived-At: >> OK, then I'd say go ahead and commit the changes. > I will, for sure. The question is rather whether to commit in the > emacs-24 branch, or in trunk. I prefer the emacs-24 branch, because the > changes are such simple. Glenn? Stefan? They don't look "obviously safe" to me, so it'd only be OK on emacs-24 if it's a regression. IOW: "how old is this problem"? Stefan