From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] make electric-pair-mode smarter/more useful Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87haalh806.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2l9wfne.fsf@yandex.ru> <87fvq49xzp.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbyuwyyc.fsf@gmail.com> <52A93B99.8040308@yandex.ru> <87r49if185.fsf@gmail.com> <52AA772D.7050503@yandex.ru> <52AC8DA6.5070403@yandex.ru> <87ppoxaaz4.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387245294 23930 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2013 01:54:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 17 02:54:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjsB-0007au-FL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 02:54:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VsjsB-0007JF-1j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsjs1-0007A9-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsjru-0003rD-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:49 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:34912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vsjrt-0003r9-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBH1sa6T025832; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 90B48AE2BE; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:54:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:26:00 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4794=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4794> : inlines <330> : streams <1092008> : uri <1626293> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166530 Archived-At: > So a separate minor mode that on activation/deactivation adds/removes > the rule to/from the default value of electric-layout-rules, right? No, I was thinking of a minor mode completely independent from electric-layout-mode. Integrated in electric-pair-mode, instead. > OR did you mean a new minor mode completely independent from > electric-layout-mode, i.e., loose that 'after-stay nonsense that I proposed > earlier. Right (tho I wouldn't say it's non-sense, it might even be useful in other circumstances). Stefan