From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reporting Lisp errors in dynamic modules Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:37:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83egfbsnu2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449157101 17876 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2015 15:38:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs development discussions To: =?windows-1252?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 03 16:38:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4VxR-0003Xz-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 16:38:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4VxQ-0003RA-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:38:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Vx6-0003Oe-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:37:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Vx2-0006wX-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:37:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:40082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4Vx1-0006wR-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 10:37:43 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AsEwA731xV/yr292hcgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBBwEBAQEeizqFBQeELQWMMKhUI4QWIIJ4AQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0AsEwA731xV/yr292hcgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIg3CM8jAQEBBwEBAQEeizqFBQeELQWMMKhUI4QWIIJ4AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="184383699" Original-Received: from 104-247-246-42.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([104.247.246.42]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Dec 2015 10:37:42 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C2457AE095; Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:37:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Aur=E9lien?= Aptel"'s message of "Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:33:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195816 Archived-At: >> WIBNI we could define them as Lisp_Subr? > (these initialisms are getting ridiculous) [ When weren't they? ] > Yes we could try to do that, it's still an implementation detail as > far as most module programmers are concerned. Yes, I totally agree that it's low priority. Stefan