From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:05:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171130214621.GA22157@ACM> <27985594-3bb4-ce88-8928-2ccfeac13eae@yandex.ru> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <1e542021-e389-cca4-6acd-349efddb2652@yandex.ru> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512425157 7197 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2017 22:05:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:05:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 23:05:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLys2-0001QZ-6w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:05:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45453 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLys7-0000w2-KH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:05:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLyrv-0000v1-3x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:05:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLyrq-0004AI-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:05:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=58849 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLyrp-0004AA-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:05:38 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLyrf-0000P0-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 23:05:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:krnpDeXx/n+zxwlV3iWHuosBWKk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220723 Archived-At: >> But I'd be fine keeping the old prog-indentation-context if you want. > How would that work? It's second element must be unused for the above > protocol to work. That's right. Keep it and ignore it. Stefan