From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optional support for GDI+ on Windows (emacs-28) Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:22:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86lfnh8wzn.fsf@csic.es> <83pncs1ulv.fsf@gnu.org> <86ftdoedvh.fsf@csic.es> <83d08s1nf9.fsf@gnu.org> <831rp81kfs.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y3z61m.fsf@gnu.org> <83a73vyztt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="19578"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , juanjose.garciaripoll@gmail.com, Emacs developers To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 01 21:23:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJixZ-00051u-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 21:23:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJixZ-0005cc-0N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJix4-0005Bt-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJix2-0005i7-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJix1-0005hL-6C; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 620EB1015BE; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:22:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9F5091014C3; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:22:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585768976; bh=mvHIGAT7kp0V3JZiNtT4J4vNFYV6rjg0AteZrRbKBRc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lOOsgiFCuFpWEO65sBpfQPkhqOFJDAMhfvoy10NYMfO16fIhNRjtY/t+UxbZvQsNv kHdddPn5LdXqCHWFuH3QxhV31QxRvFdSH9SonMfRS2zpIFGtvBdhEKpdTt8qqQOUXL UkACZBtfZSGLYEXL4cjho19nem+zlZt9155sn8KY34dCoxtx+6psNsSkxfyvDBHjpd shF5sopYo9wo96rgaSp/DsgjLCKfZyOkX9E7Ozw2gQn7LeOAZJfAj5Yu+59GK2BZtt CS6MmCu1OD1BGanhVyAfknKqk2fVL4+ahnJwIdwDECC+hwvwRL7KO5pxbuQmEI2710 tewsXL79MwY8w== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 537851204F5; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:22:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:39:39 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246219 Archived-At: > > A compile-time option seems plenty to get that experience. > I think most users of Emacs on Windows do not build their own Emacs. > So, if we want GDI+ support to be tested so we can trust it, we would > need to "distribute" (as we do know, non-officially) two different binaries. I'd expect we'd distribute the development version built from `master` `--with-gdiplus` so we get feedback about it before we start the pretest period of Emacs-28. Stefan