From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Priority of url-cookie-trusted-urls vs url-cookie-untrusted-urls Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:12:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20200731144809.6E89CC21C82@raman-glaptop.localdomain> <87d04b20qt.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, "T.V Raman" To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 31 17:13:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WjB-000Aco-Rw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:13:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WjA-0006fe-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WiW-0006DQ-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:3918) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1WiU-0004yz-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id F3360100F88; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:12:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 36CEB10082B; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:12:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1596208371; bh=yFPCIAGV+dnY0hTxfT3TemJW3VqgeIGFKKImpsdk0gY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=POW+DAJwCGQ50No/jn+gcLhfTw3qDOP/mV72em+Bv5K7AVGgHolO/OVHT5B6WKr6w m21HuhZ1kOLvmKNX8cTJtv1BtlY6OmKYubMeInqZcilKFrbHsQV6vIGhM4BhRylM7d BggniXTyQ3O4t/toF4k4q9N13Hx1ox4VhEE6svekUoNOJwYaCMnIy+U3MX1RZHpGpu vHRpD3mQaC4F8Q9naTAahe/rcHB2GKlSM4dcz5DDQocpl3Pu/gDrRCcE3Sh3Pod8lU P2jokZOmqvlMa7tf//2jUNnAR/wCzvBR2o0u3kC22v6PTARBJiGE03fMkM9ZK1DyOv jAnLzFdI+PMsg== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [45.72.246.108]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020A11203D6; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:12:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87d04b20qt.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:54:50 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/31 11:12:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253368 Archived-At: >> From what I observe, if you set url-cookie-untrusted-urls to '(".*"), >> then the setting in url-cookie-trusted-urls e.g. '("example.com") has >> no effect. This makes it hard to set up emacs/eww to not trust any >> domain, and then progressively allow a few domains to set cookies; >> could the priority order of these settings be reversed? > > If you set url-cookie-untrusted-urls to ("") it will always be less > specific than any match from url-cookie-trusted-urls. IIUC which one takes precedence depends on the length of the match, right? If so, the docstring should say so. Stefan