From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Introducing face in comments for various modes Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9ZK1Solghrmps4AarUsz2E6-mAdkrTZoXPs4RTRTd9sZ0Cd8DGhK955im1kuug-EZXU3tc5rgDDd16vQexxpFnMvMFjFqnNnh0noashyLdE=@protonmail.com> <0RJB0bPRTMAqXlUbL2kGUvJtnCNPYwPhqTNi_l9nIpQAciTZYcYCikFVqi2Nr_UZLbT1_DRtX8G0dSkgI4jln5DTYBDxLz4i7L2d9wx-kA8=@protonmail.com> <21708ec2-d908-4e91-6c0a-4b1cd253e707@gmail.com> <009361a1-4430-ac3a-f395-ce32f10b31f2@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Thibaut Verron , Heime , help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 18:44:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mr8-0007Zl-Im for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 18:44:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mqi-00071a-1y; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mqc-00071C-M3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4mqb-00009M-1X for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 264601000F8; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DA23C1000D5; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1670867049; bh=ZuYYgGue7fiNN337gbWdslbeihFfr9jyzx/HzXhUpXA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Bhe2vTQyI3lWRJkTZ6al3zZjx7Z0njbbhzUolz8Zzzvxp74Hkr3yaqWbkTMc66i9t Yd7J3Jb/1OvQ1Va56F1hYYM5dELqaB+3jnHXAPEDxIrxskTlGjIKW3E8t79X2g0SMN Ac4iPLLYg48UM+Y9HRX+LXpwOx+4AKYr5e1iu4VD+cU744AK0gR/ChGpqKuWPXX7/a ZkeMeKcCTsTcdAKfsr0+lWfsawdZBNSTm/YMuYRXtvPN5SQkJAzOJOqObPlaQLD332 d2EdyXlK0RV+vRObovkb1tWuqXLrkBDMnQQwW00ZekWGL+/1RHd1IUNY4tCNuSkfdK 068qwGYqBmlfg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.193.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADA1D120281; Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:44:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Yuri Khan's message of "Mon, 12 Dec 2022 22:22:52 +0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:141684 Archived-At: > Heime has a point. The complaint is not about *readability* of > modus-vivendi=E2=80=99s colors against the background. It is about > *distinction* between levels of Org headings, i.e. ability to > distinguish a level 3 heading from a level 4 just by color. AFAIK relying colors to express the heading level would be a mistake. > As far as I can tell, WCAG does not give any guidance as to > distinction between foreground colors, except for =E2=80=9Cthou shalt not= make > the user rely solely on color=E2=80=9D. I think that guidance is quite apt here :-) Stefan