From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug Date: 16 Oct 2003 14:49:13 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200310121947.h9CJlhKH006102@oak.pohoyda.family> <6480-Thu16Oct2003192118+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066330782 5084 80.91.224.253 (16 Oct 2003 18:59:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 20:59:39 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AADLX-00082h-00 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:59:39 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AADLX-0006mX-00 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:59:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AADCL-0003sS-Vu for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AADC7-0003sD-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AADBb-0003oS-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AADBb-0003oB-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from vor.iro.umontreal.ca (vor.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.42]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9GInDUN022912; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:49:14 -0400 Original-Received: by vor.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 42DDD3C63E; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <6480-Thu16Oct2003192118+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17169 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17169 > The question is, do we care that we lose information, and do we need > to recreate the original format? That's exactly what I was asking > Alexander to explain. I need to be able to forward/resend a GPG-signed message (or a message with a GPG-signed subpart), so at least in those cases we need to preserve all the information. Stefan PS: All the MUAs I know do the processing upon display, so I don't understand why it would pose any performance problem.