From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `key-binding' and XEmacs-style events Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:19:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <36817.128.165.123.18.1172703473.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172762677 9868 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2007 15:24:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 01 16:24:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMn4f-0005WG-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:20:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMn4g-0006Q7-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMn4U-0006Q1-Ld for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:19:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMn4T-0006Ph-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMn4T-0006Pe-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:19:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HMn4S-0004vn-Lo; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:19:52 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD102CF2A2; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:19:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2357C3FE1; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:19:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1C1516C805; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:19:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu\, 01 Mar 2007 03\:14\:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67137 Archived-At: > Obviously (key-binding [?a]) works just as well, but in order to write > code that flexibly manipulates keystrokes it would be nice if the XEmacs > syntax could always be used even in degenerate cases. > I agree. Would someone please fix this and ack? AFAIK, [?a] works in XEmacs as well. It's only when you have modifiers that the Emacs syntax is not understood by XEmacs. Stefan