From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Build failure: feature not provided Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080420.164106.242671201.hanche@math.ntnu.no> <7yhcdwmhxr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208722805 11049 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2008 20:20:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Harald Hanche-Olsen To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 20 22:20:40 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jng1e-0000Ta-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 22:20:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jng0y-0000SQ-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jng0u-0000Pl-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jng0s-0000Lu-MM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jng0s-0000Li-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jng0s-0005wl-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jng0s-0003U0-02 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jng0p-0005wN-Fp for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182] helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jng0p-0005wH-8w; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswEAJtBC0hMCqsI/2dsb2JhbACBUKdB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,686,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="18796817" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2008 16:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.171.8]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id AYN37043; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:43 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1C978895A; Sun, 20 Apr 2008 16:19:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7yhcdwmhxr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:42:40 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95542 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22088 Archived-At: > Obviously I disagree, since I made the opposite changes in the first place. I know. But I have no idea why you bothered to make such a change. After all, the file that does the `require' should be loaded only once anyway and this `require' is the only place where we may load this loaddefs file, so `load' would work just as well. And if someone ever decides to reload calendar.el, I wonder why you think it wrong for cal-loaddefs. to also be reloaded. It's not like it matters much, either way, really. Stefan