From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7253: comment-dwim should easily allow mid-line comments Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:40:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k4lc42ly.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287686580 1309 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2010 18:43:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7253@debbugs.gnu.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 21 20:42:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P906L-000787-I2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:42:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52140 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P906K-0007ga-HY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50351 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P9066-0007d1-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9065-0005bO-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P9064-0005bK-Vq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P900c-0001l2-32; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7253 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7253-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7253.12876861746736 (code B ref 7253); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2010 18:36:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zzq-0001kb-Ky for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8zzn-0001kU-Qd for 7253@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o9LIe1WS003963; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0E530B45E5; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:40:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4lc42ly.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:00:09 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3655=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:37:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41043 Archived-At: > Excellent question. One would think adding a prefix argument to M-; > would be good... but that probably already is taken... and wait, M-; is > bound to different commands in different modes... No, M-; should usually not be rebound in major-mods. > Yuck. E.g., as I write this it is bound to comment-region. Sounds like a misfeature of the major mode you're using. Can you give us some details? Stefan