From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Emacs 23, Debian and the "fixed" font
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:15:44 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jwvk4go7zh4.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>
References: <slrnimdhi7.15e.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>
	<87bp219jcf.fsf@rapttech.com.au>
	<slrnimdorb.15e.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>
	<jwvtyfsaem2.fsf-monnier+gnu.emacs.help@gnu.org>
	<87wrkotudy.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298659230 28449 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 18:40:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 19:40:27 2011
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pt2aY-0006D5-GW
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:40:26 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41849 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Pt2aY-0005wo-3L
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:40:26 -0500
Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
Original-Lines: 14
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
	posting-host="y54ldFr5N8l153uWsQTCVQ"; 
	logging-data="20906"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5quz7SMB8eR9ZpxGQndtg"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2osONcYe2aCN6ox298p88R3CJGM=
	sha1:S0FBVQw0+wc62jjFQbAO3CnVfUs=
Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:185317
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:79472
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/79472>

>>> I was thinking about 22, but the Debian people seem to have jumped
>>> straight from 21 to 23 because of some perceived problem with Emacs 22
>>> and Unicode.
>> No, it's just that Emacs-22 came out too late for Debian-5.0
> Wrong, it is actually included and the default Emacs version.  But Emacs
> 21 is also included, and people who did not have the "emacs" metapackage
> installed were not automatically taken to Emacs 22 when upgrading from
> Debian 4.0.

Thanks, so my "No" was correct, but its justification was not.
I stand corrected.  Thanks for the clarification,


        Stefan