From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eldoc support with M-: Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:29:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87liy3t6rk.fsf@gmail.com> <20110519.175536.23311605.rubikitch@ruby-lang.org> <87hb8rt4ha.fsf@gmail.com> <87liw5z8sl.fsf@gmail.com> <87aabj82sq.fsf@gmail.com> <87vcsazaia.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317832165 32538 80.91.229.12 (5 Oct 2011 16:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 16:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Thierry Volpiatto , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 18:29:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBULN-0001ki-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:29:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44475 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBULN-00037s-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:29:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBULK-00037c-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBULJ-0004wZ-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBULJ-0004wE-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p95GT81q009718; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7A517B4346; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:29:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:20:58 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4001=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4001> : streams <688514> : uri <976392> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144585 Archived-At: > Sounds good. How about something as shown in the attachment? Sounds about right. Please keep it around while we're in feature freeze. In the mean time you can try and reimplement eldoc-eval as a patch against eldoc.el using this approach. Stefan