From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:42 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87d2kmuyxg.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387898810 11131 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 15:26:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:26:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 16:26:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvTl8-0001a4-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:19:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39083 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvTl7-0001Wu-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvTkx-0001OF-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvTkq-0005ak-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:47537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvTkq-0005ag-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBOFIfts012615; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:42 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1BA76AE086; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 10:18:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87d2kmuyxg.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:05:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4802=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4802> : inlines <357> : streams <1096304> : uri <1633839> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166834 Archived-At: > I got sidetracked at that time, but I'm currently working it. The > essential functionality won't change, though: the main work is done in > eieio.el and eieio-opt.el. The only things that get's added to > help-fns.el is the new `help-fns-describe-function-functions' hook. > Would it be OK to apply it in the coming days? I remember discussions around that, yes. Send us the patch and we'll see if that can be installed. > Also, I'd like to do another sync from CEDET upstream, but AFAICS that's > only bugfixes. If it's only bug-fixes then it's fine, yes. Stefan