From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16461: 24.3.50; electric eats too much Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87vbxk5ppo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87fvon58zo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87iotf6nw1.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390230734 1230 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2014 15:12:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16461-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 20 16:12:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5GWR-0000Qu-8R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:12:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5GWQ-0007o8-Oq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5FbC-0008D1-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:13:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5Fb4-0004Au-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5Fb4-0004An-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5Fb3-0002Xh-O0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16461 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16461-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16461.13902271469721 (code D ref 16461); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16461-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2014 14:12:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57951 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5FaU-0002Wj-Bo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:44754) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W5FaS-0002Wb-MY for 16461-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 69-165-163-162.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.163.162]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 21FE960094; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:12:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87iotf6nw1.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:47:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83771 Archived-At: >> Looks OK, thanks. This difference between back-to-indentation and >> backward-to-indentation is really obscure. > Perhaps a new function with more descriptive name could be added later. I think back-to-indentation should use the same " \t" pattern rather than rely on syntax tables. Stefan