From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Turning off colorization Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:26:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874muenb56.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87egtivwop.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k33951ey.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871tpgwsnc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20141106160327.GB3385@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415460406 21617 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2014 15:26:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 08 16:26:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn7uQ-0006bC-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:26:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36111 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn7uQ-0005BK-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:26:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48374) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn7u5-0005AB-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:26:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn7ty-0007bG-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:26:17 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:46965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xn7tq-0007aY-1v; Sat, 08 Nov 2014 10:26:02 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIxALDiYSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IPAS-Result: Au4MAOatTlRLd+sd/2dsb2JhbABcgw6DYoZ+y1MEAgKBHBcBAXyEAwEBAwFWIxALDiYSFBgNJIhLCctyAQEBAQYBAQEBHpEIB4RLBYtkpjyBb4QWH4J6AQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,797,1406606400"; d="scan'208";a="96277798" Original-Received: from 75-119-235-29.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.235.29]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Nov 2014 10:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 415B67CFA; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:26:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 08 Nov 2014 01:44:52 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176575 Archived-At: >> No. It would only affect efficiency > Would it still work to type M-x font-lock-mode to disable font lock > in the current buffer? If not, what would one have to do? I can't think of any obvious reason why we couldn't keep using M-x font-lock-mode for that, but I haven't thought nearly enough about it to be able to tell you. Can we stop this hypothetical discussion? Stefan