From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Removing rollback from VC mode - request for comment Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20141211092138.6D5F6C008E@snark.thyrsus.com> <87y4qcj2mq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87mw6sdetf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87tx10iya1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87iohgdarf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418410972 30446 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2014 19:02:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 19:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 20:02:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzVUC-0005Cn-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:02:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzVUC-0002EQ-Jc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzVTs-0002Cf-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzVTk-0007xJ-Oq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:24 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:59139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzVTc-0007wL-OY; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:08 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwPAOwQflTO+ILA/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiEoJ1lkBAQEBBgEBAQEekG8HhEgFiwGkLoF4hBkhgncBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AjwPAOwQflTO+ILA/2dsb2JhbABbgweDYIVaxR0EAgKBJBcBAQEBAQF8hAMBAQMBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiEoJ1lkBAQEBBgEBAQEekG8HhEgFiwGkLoF4hBkhgncBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,502,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="100321547" Original-Received: from 206-248-130-192.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.130.192]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 12 Dec 2014 14:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 547742F23; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:02:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87iohgdarf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:43:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179952 Archived-At: > Well, it was the inspiration for preview-latex's "never touch the buffer > text" philosophy. It would be interesting to redo X-Symbol with text > overlays rather than actual text replacements, but it could trigger > performance problems. Which part of X-Symbol is still useful? Stefan