From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20569: 24.5; Vertical scroll bar is shorter than frame in info buffer Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lhgs3s10.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <6763ACD5-57CB-4F90-ABDB-FF9BE7322FC1@swipnet.se> <87d223476s.fsf@moondust.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431619172 22215 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2015 15:59:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20569@debbugs.gnu.org To: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 17:59:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXa-0000hk-0P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 17:59:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55352 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXY-0002zJ-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXQ-0002zC-4E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:59:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXK-0006z0-K2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35277) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXK-0006yw-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvXK-0002Sb-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20569 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20569-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20569.14316191019352 (code B ref 20569); Thu, 14 May 2015 15:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20569) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2015 15:58:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45252 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvWd-0002Qi-JA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:58:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:43748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YsvWb-0002QY-L2 for 20569@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361D311C045; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:58:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ACA1A97E5; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 934C7B41A0; Thu, 14 May 2015 11:57:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87d223476s.fsf@moondust.localdomain> (N. Jackson's message of "Thu, 14 May 2015 10:31:07 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:102793 Archived-At: > Emacs does a lot of things differently (and better) than other programs, > but the widgets of a graphical user interface constitute a visual > language. Would it not be better for Emacs to speak the same language as > the rest of the world rather than inventing its own? I don't think this difference matters very much either way. Since both options have justifications, I'm sure some people will want to keep the current behavior, so either we'll have to annoy them, or introduce a config var, which will make the code yet a bit more hairy in this respect. If someone wants to submit a patch to change that, we will consider it, but I doubt you'll find someone motivated enough to tweak this little detail. Stefan