From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433370523 12727 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 22:28:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 22:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tsdh@gnu.org, nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nick Andryshak Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 04 00:28:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H94-0004CT-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:28:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H93-00041A-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H90-00040u-He for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H8z-0004bf-Pq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:2718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0H8w-0004bN-7p; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 18:28:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AxFgA731xV/3K9xEVcgxCEAoVVu0CHSwQCAoE8OxIBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEEViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiD/PIwEBAQcCAR+LOoUFB4QtAQSYO5sEgUUjhBQigngBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0AxFgA731xV/3K9xEVcgxCEAoVVu0CHSwQCAoE8OxIBAQEBAQEBgQpBBYNdAQEEViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiD/PIwEBAQcCAR+LOoUFB4QtAQSYO5sEgUUjhBQigngBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="124133333" Original-Received: from 69-196-189-114.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.189.114]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jun 2015 18:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 745DA661A6; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:28:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Nick Andryshak's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:34:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187007 Archived-At: > Apply this same logic to string< and string>. Emacs is inconsistent. That's part of its inheritance. If someone wants to add string>, I'm perfectly OK with it. But I'm surprised noone is arguing here in favor of dropping string< and making < and > accept strings instead! Stefan