From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't complain about changed file when it hasn't changed Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:35:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83oa4bbq5b.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8fvbkxd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472517156 16397 195.159.176.226 (30 Aug 2016 00:32:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:32:36 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 30 02:32:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1beWyc-0003sn-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 02:32:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beWya-00076b-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:32:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beWyT-00075F-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beWyP-0003D6-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:32:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:35084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1beWyO-0003Cn-S2; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u7U0WEqF023130; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5B90B66274; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 20:35:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83a8fvbkxd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:26:54 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5781=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5781> : inlines <5153> : streams <1692177> : uri <2277660> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206908 Archived-At: >> > Anyway, the proposed implementation misses a few subtleties, IMO: >> Revised patch, > Thanks. I guess you decided not to bother about the unibyte buffer > case? Exactly. If it doesn't work right, it shouldn't have serious consequences, and for all I know, it might even happen to work right. Stefan