From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving GNU ELPA Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8737a1w8i0.fsf@strawberry> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499911444 10871 195.159.176.226 (13 Jul 2017 02:04:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 02:04:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 13 04:03:57 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVTTw-00028f-9j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 04:03:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVTTx-0004rK-6d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVTTI-0004rB-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVTTF-0000P4-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:48705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVTTF-0000Jg-LT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v6D2389S027796; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9D54E660B0; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 22:03:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8737a1w8i0.fsf@strawberry> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2017 01:17:11 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6070=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6070> : inlines <5977> : streams <1753943> : uri <2461743> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216566 Archived-At: >> PS: BTW, to clarify my position: if it were up to me, I'd get rid of the >> copyright assignment policy for GNU ELPA (and for Emacs as well, >> while we're at it) > Je voudrais comprendre pourquoi tu penses =E7a. > Tu peux m'expliquer ? Je ne pense pas que =E7a en vaut la peine: le gain est n=E9gligeable compar=E9 au co=FBt. > (ou r=E9pondre sur la mailing-list si tu pr=E9f=E8res). Je ne pense pas que ce soit utile d'en discuter, parce que la position de Richard est ferme l=E0 dessus =E0 ma connaissance (et c'est bien trop mi= neur pour m=E9riter un fork). Stefan