From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17893: 24.4.50; (error "Marker does not point anywhere") Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:08:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8facd635-be88-4990-8e7d-538db19c3e1a@default> <04af8576-c419-4d35-9c6e-7170828ac949@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510690040 10245 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2017 20:07:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 17893@debbugs.gnu.org To: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 14 21:07:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhUC-0001vf-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:07:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhUG-0004Xy-Mv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhUB-0004Xq-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhU6-0005YG-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60154) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhU6-0005Xj-6j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhU5-0001s1-O9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:07:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17893 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17893-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17893.15106900107169 (code B ref 17893); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17893) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2017 20:06:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhTt-0001rZ-Nl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:48530) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEhTr-0001rR-De for 17893@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from lechazo.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id vAEK6cSg023377; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:06:39 -0500 Original-Received: by lechazo.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A1EA9603A7; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:08:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Charles A. Roelli's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:56:58 +0100") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6158=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6158> : inlines <6171> : streams <1770292> : uri <2533949> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139900 Archived-At: > I was not careful to make sure that the mark-ring contains valid > markers, so it may be an error in my code. On the other hand, looking > at the definition of `clone-buffer' (which my patch uses), I don't see > anything that would update the markers of the mark-ring in the newly > cloned buffer to point to the new buffer instead of the old one. > Maybe that is also a problem? Yup, sounds like we have a bug in clone-buffer, at least. Stefan