From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83wo5d3cuf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0gtkrl.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="80454"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, joaotavora@gmail.com, eller.helmut@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 16 14:57:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZwNd-000Kpt-RZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 14:57:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52782 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZwNc-0002Qu-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZwN9-00020L-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:14421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZwN7-00058D-TT; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0998C4402E5; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 709F34402E2; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1589633814; bh=0tBLMwEQvCUS8iEyiCzfWd7byq7KncYrC+mn2KYeqOA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LofKdapEj1qKfye0LxA6gZPzqy5e9JwpKoqPXNfgMdPICJo9kWENV+UEYE1ENSId9 aq21b6wPV2x5wHfKnlUERKYZ+ycr/1bqP8hECrU8YO3cNOtrV1IaMQRBK3J7zgmCQd /MMuSVtz+3hWVRAU56/L0R4eUKkWlLmn2k5nsEs0LyvuxVOmdwCDKDbIMXYEzFsipD x6+p5wVc/tAH8v5zBQg65z+2KoaDe+VOi/zkuoeh5vC06FDU2ks7ZAQ6Gx3QsUyTDj 8j5LMNTLUTargwpJAKpyXbNNDfkI6P785aTtqRfBmRoPYk4CyzaEi0XP5exEHjn73B VRjtym1W4mllQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.27.250]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E293C1202C1; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:56:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83tv0gtkrl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 May 2020 10:13:34 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/16 08:48:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250485 Archived-At: > mode line. So perhaps we should mentions shr in the mode line as well > in these cases, as minor mode or somesuch? I'm not sure this info is important enough to warrant displaying it in the mode-line, but `describe-mode` would be a "natural" place, indeed. Stefan