From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's the best (i.e. least bad) way to re-redisplay? Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="406"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 22:37:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIzdx-000AQn-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 22:37:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55188 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIzdv-0003R6-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIzdL-0002YC-G7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:55182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIzdI-00039Q-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8078B809C6; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED36A8065C; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1629923780; bh=0BM9qu5PqGbW4iHD7ybsoCUbWPaJhjIM6t3swIViSKE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=WXy6aLoTSjes423Lf9hcLUg3dKjqf+w98LgkqGnzT9Put8/WCoAZTGqay7OX5QMw1 rM2JngsZE8KU0pM3ZuXxnnVw6pcxruu5smmyVMoMQxiJPnshIAXPWQTb2M7qr0jh2z VJ8HVBFD2Ehe3pJ7TIJpOnyUdjnf6WDiozJWxWCS2h04r7DryfpkN+LnpvHRGnnEDO 3ef43cBQNuICrr2mOF7i/DDU+V5Njh5sVcR8gm46/U4pz6+pxl0uGee4CzXQjk52gf Z8mmroM3ATUU2t1C4WVBJUh5bVsvA+HwZDYtzN2YusT9yQLFInP80JN7AoCPdv+rr5 RTkm6+gerHceQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1972120329; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:36:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 20:09:24 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272991 Archived-At: > But, looking at the code, font-lock-flush works by clearing the > 'fontified property, nothing more. This won't always trigger a > redisplay, will it? Doesn't it need after-change-functions to be active > at the time? Yes, that's why it's run from a timer, to avoid the let-binding of `inhibit-modification-hooks` that's active during font-lock. Stefan